Via electronic mail and
overnight mail
November 27, 2002
Ms. Janice W. Blake-Green
U.S. Department of Housing
and
Urban Development
Office of the Chief Financial
Officer
451 7th Street, S.W., Room
2214
Washington, DC 20410
Subject: Challenge to the
Inclusion of the Following Positions on
HUD’s A-76/FAIR Act Inventory—
Dear Ms. Blake-Green:
As the President of the Council of
HUD Locals, 222, of the American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO
which represents employees working at the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development, as well as in my capacity as an "interested party" as
established under the provisions of section 3(b) of the Federal Activities and
Inventory Reform Act (FAIR Act) of 1998, Public Law 105-270, and as the head of
a labor organization as described in section 7103(a)(4) of title 5, United
States Code, I submit the following challenge to selected items contained in
the Department’s Commercial Activities Inventory of or about April 6,
2002. Notice of the Inventory was
published in the Federal Register on or about October 17, 2002.
Specifically,
I am challenging the decision to include the positions listed below. I am challenging their inclusion as
Commercial Activities in every organization and wherever the organization may
be physically located.
Assistant Secretary For
Housing-Federal Housing Commissioner:
Activity
Function Codes/Positions:
C408
Asset Management
D000 Administrative
Support
D606
Asset Appraisal and Valuation
D708
Application Receipt/Processing
D709
Mortgage Underwriting
T804
Architect-Engineering
Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian
Housing:
Activity
Function Codes/Positions:
C401
Financial Analyst
D000
Administrative Support
L200
Grants Monitoring and Evaluation
T804
Architect-Engineering
Activity Function
Codes/Positions:
D000 Administrative Support
Assistant Secretary for Field
Policy and Management
Activity Function
Codes/Positions:
D000 Administrative Support
L200 Grants Monitoring and Evaluation
Office of General Counsel
Activity Function
Codes/Positions:
D000 Administrative Support
Assistant Secretary for Administration
Activity Function
Codes/Positions:
L200 Grants Monitoring and Evaluation
Chief Financial Officer
Activity Function
Codes/Positions:
C401 Financial Analyst
The
Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP) Policy Letter 92-1,
"Inherently Governmental Functions" of September 23, 1992 defines
inherently governmental functions as follows:
An
inherently governmental function involves the execution of the laws of the
United States so as to [a] bind the U.S. to take or not take some action, … [c]
significantly affect the life liberty or property of private persons, … [e]
exert ultimate control over … the disbursement of appropriated funds.
As
a matter of policy, an "inherently governmental function" is a
function that is so intimately related to the public interest as to mandate
performance by Government employees.
These functions include those activities that require either the
exercise of discretion in applying government authority or the making of value
judgments in making decisions for the Government.
It is my contention that in accordance with the above
definition, all of the work categorized under the above-referenced Commercial
Activity codes should be rightfully defined and reclassified as inherently
governmental. The basis of this
contention for each position shall be addressed in separate attachments.
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
should uphold these challenges, change its decision and exclude the activities
from its list of commercial activities.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter. I request that the decision regarding this
challenge be sent to me at P.O. Box 5961, Boston, MA 02114.
Sincerely,
Carolyn Federoff, President
AFGE Council of HUD Locals, 222
Attachments
cc: Council 222 Executive Board
and Local Presidents
AFGE National Office (Public Policy Department)
Assistant Secretary for Housing-Federal
Housing Commissioner A-76/FAIR Act Inventory:
C408 Asset
Management
1. The employees serving in positions indicated by this
function code are engaged in activities that bind the United States to take or
not to take some action by contract, policy, regulation, authorization, and/or
order, as described in the Detailed Description of Duties set out herein
below. These activities require the
exercise of discretion involving monetary transactions and entitlements. By defining this function as inherently
governmental, the agency will guarantee that any final agency action complies
with the laws and policies of the United States. Additionally, this will ensure
that the decisions performed by these employees reflect the independent
conclusions of agency officials.
2. The employees who perform this function have access to
competition and procurement sensitive information, as described in the Detailed
Description of Duties set out herein below.
This function necessitates the use of discretion with regard to monetary
transactions and entitlements. Access
to this sensitive information by a non-federal employee would compromise the
integrity of future competitions, contracts, and procurement actions. It would impede governmental authority and
disrupt the procurement process. In
addition, releasing to a contractor the information necessary to accomplish the
function will result in contractor access to confidential business information.
3.
The employees who
perform this function exert ultimate control over the acquisition, use, or
disposition of the property, real or personal, tangible or intangible, of the
United States, including the collection, control, or disbursement of
appropriated and other Federal funds, as described in the Detailed Description
of Duties set out herein below.
Maintaining this function as inherently governmental ensures in using
the products of these contracts, that any final agency action complies with the
laws and policies of the United States.
Description of duties and
relation to inherently governmental standards
for C408 Asset Management
HUD
Asset Managers are primarily concerned with monitoring and compliance-assurance
activities that involve the application and interpretation of HUD statutes,
regulations, handbooks, guidelines and directives. The focus of these activities is to serve the taxpayers by
protecting the FHA Mortgage Insurance funds and direct lending programs against
fraud, waste and abuse, and to help assure an adequate supply of safe,
affordable housing.
The mortgagees and mortgagors that perform work on loans
submitted for FHA mortgage insurance are profit-motivated and seek a government
guarantee that they will not suffer from any mortgage loan default that may
occur. Should a default occur, the
mortgagee will seek to have the outstanding mortgage paid by the FHA mortgage
insurance. Further, because these are
non-recourse loans, FHA may not pursue the mortgagor’s other assets to cover
losses that may be sustained.
Similarly, although mortgagors in the direct lending programs
(such as the Section 202 and 811 programs) are non-profit, they too seek a
government guarantee that they will not suffer from any mortgage loan default
that may occur. Should a default occur,
HUD will cover the losses. HUD will not
pursue the mortgagor’s other assets to cover losses that may be sustained.
The public’s interest is secured only by the real estate, not
by any other asset of the mortgagor or mortgagee. Under these circumstances, the work of the HUD Asset Manager is
central to the protection of the public’s interest.
Asset
Managers are also responsible for the oversight and management of Section 8 and
other rental subsidy programs whose total expenditure approximates $20 billion
annually. Asset managers are also
responsible for contracting with owners to initiate subsidy payments,
calculating the amounts and monitoring such funds to protect against fraud,
waste, and abuse.
More specifically, the Asset
Management position involves the following activities:
a. Acquiring and analyzing facts and utilizing sound
judgment in applying legal and technical standards to these facts;
b. Analyzing the pertinent regulations;
c. Conducting management reviews and audits of owners, agents, mortgagees, tenants, and
other HUD clients to determine if their practices comply with the federal
regulations;
d. Recommending appropriate actions to correct
noncompliance;
e. Monitoring subsequent owners, agents, mortgages,
tenant, and other HUD clients’ activities to ensure the prescribed corrective
steps have been taken; and
f.
Writing review reports
summarizing all findings and recommendations and performing follow up to ensure
compliance.
Upon
discovery of non-compliance with the various HUD requirements, Asset
Managers must then undertake a variety
of corrective actions. These include
the following:
a. Issuing letters of non-compliance or other statements
informing the program participants of program deficiencies;
b. Determining whether a given property meets HUD’s
physical, financial, and occupancy standards;
c. Directing the issuance of Notices of Default where
owners or agents are found to be noncompliant with HUD ‘s requirements;
d. Reviewing and referring owners and agents, found to be
noncompliant, to the Departmental Enforcement Center;
e. Preparing Limited Denials of Participation in HUD
programs against owners, agents, and
other participants found to have been significantly noncompliant;
f.
Assembling data and
administrative records for administrative hearings, including those before
Administrative Law Judges or Federal Courts including foreclosure
recommendations and mortgagee in possession actions;
g. Recommending the suspension or termination of
mortgages, agents, owners, and other participants;
h. Recommending debarment of program participants; and
i.
Numerous other
compliance and monitoring tasks.
Asset
Managers also perform the following duties:
a.
Evaluating and
monitoring Contract Administrators by performing regular compliance reviews of
subsidy administration duties;
b.
Acting as the Government Technical
Representative for contracts relating to asset management support services;
c. Evaluating the credentials of owners and management
agents to determine whether the applicants should be approved to own and/or
manage HUD insured and subsidy properties;
d.
Monitoring owners’ and
agents’ compliance with numerous insurance and subsidy programs;
e.
Evaluating owners’ and
agents’ requests for waivers regarding programs and other HUD requirements;
f.
Answering heavy volumes
of technical questions via telephone and electronic mail communications from
owners, agents, tenants, other real estate and legal professionals, and the
general public;
The following tasks are also
performed by Asset Managers:
a.
Answering Congressional
Inquiries;
b.
Responding to requests
under the Freedom of Information Act;
c.
Working with HUD and GAO
auditors and inspectors in the review and monitoring of HUD/FHA programs;
d.
Analyzing the
requirements of the physical asset to make it financially viable and to ensure
that it meets HUD’s standard of providing decent, safe, and sanity
housing;
e. Advising
and educating owners, agents, tenants, lenders and other real estate
professionals concerning HUD standards and requirements for maintaining HUD
housing;
f.
Answering questions from
owners, agents, and tenants concerning delinquent loans, contract renewals,
mortgage prepayments, and transfer of assets;
g.
Counseling and advising
owners and agents of all pertinent options and available resources in order to
avoid or cure mortgage defaults, and thereby help them avoid displacement of
tenants;
h.
Developing creative
approaches to present HUD programs to individuals and groups from diverse
backgrounds, often in the context of highly sensitive and controversial
issues;
i.
Communicating
effectively, orally and in writing, with HUD clients, local government
officials, citizen groups, counseling agencies, attorneys, professional
organizations, and the public at large on a wide variety of matters; and
j.
Developing and
presenting training seminars for owners, agents, tenants, and other program
participants concerning HUD insured and subsidized housing requirements
including Section 8 Renewals, prepayments, opt outs, and other matters of
concern to the public and industry.
The above-described multiple duties
of the Asset Management position do not stand alone, but must be integrated to
form the basis for decisions. Merging
all of these compliance, monitoring, and oversight functions may reveal
conflicts with government directives or regulations. The function of forming decisions, merging technical data,
resolving conflicts, or finding them irresolvable, is an integral part of
protecting FHA insurance funds and HUD’s direct lending programs. If not done properly, the result can be the
deterioration, misuse, misappropriation or other degradation of the physical
asset. This not only adversely affects the FHA insurance funds and HUD direct
lending programs; it also harms
families, neighborhoods and communities.
There
is a lot of money to be made in real estate development on the front
end—financing fees, construction costs, architectural drawings, and much
more. But FHA insurance and HUD direct
loan programs last for forty years.
After almost all of the private sector interests have made their profit
and moved to the next deal, HUD and FHA remain at risk. Asset Managers are a critical part of the
review necessary to keep properties from foreclosure. The Real Estate Assessment and Enforcement Centers have recovered
tens of millions of dollars from owners subject to review. That number would be astronomical without
dedicated Asset Managers. By
comparison, Housing Finance Agency (HFA) overseen Section 8 contracts as
recently as four years ago had rent levels double that of comparable
HUD-overseen Section 8 projects. In
these particular projects, HFAs charge servicing fees based on rents. It is in their interest to allow higher rent
levels.
It should also be noted
that, for many borrowers, FHA mortgage insurance is mortgage insurance of last
resort. Transactions that are dismissed
outright in the conventional private sector will often be found on FHA’s
doorstep. Therefore, FHA insured
properties require more, not less, scrutiny than conventional properties.
Finally, allowing contractors to do these functions would
necessarily result in the release of information that is confidential commercial
and financial information, and would potentially harm the competitive abilities
of mortgagors and mortgagees who do business with HUD. Data submitted as part of regular monitoring
and asset management reveals business sources, estimated costs of doing
business and other information that rivals could use to competitive
advantage. Corporations do not have
rights under the Privacy Act to insist the government not disclose information. But we have specifically recognized a
business’s right to have information declared exempt from disclosure under the
Freedom of Information Act when it is confidential commercial or financial
information. This declaration lasts for
ten years (24 C.F.R. Section 15.108).
While FOIA would not preclude the agency from releasing this information
to a contractor working for the agency, it should be used as an indication of
the high level of confidentiality HUD regularly affords this sort of
information. Allowing access to this
confidential information by persons other than Federal employees would
jeopardize the legitimate business interests of the agency’s clients.
Conclusion:
C408 Asset Management
Maintaining
this function as inherently governmental ensures that any final agency action
complies with the laws and policies of the United States. Maintaining it as inherently governmental
ensures that decisions reflect the independent conclusions of agency officials
and not those of contractors who may have interests that are not in concert
with the public interest, and may be beyond the reach of management controls
otherwise applicable to public employees.
Additionally, this will ensure that the decisions made by these
employees reflect the independent conclusions of agency officials.
Additionally, the
work performed under this category involves access to confidential business
information. Access by other than an
employee of the federal government would compromise legitimate business
interests of the agency’s clients. It
would impede governmental authority and disrupt the procurement process.
Finally,
the asset management function directly affects the quality of life and the
safety of the personal property of private persons living in HUD-insured and
subsidized housing. Executing the laws, which govern the housing programs
managed by the Assistant Secretary for Housing, should be inherently
governmental, not commercial.
Assistant Secretary for
Housing-Federal Housing Commissioner A-76/FAIR Act Inventory:
D000 Administrative Support
The
primary function of the Housing Administrative Support (AS) person is to
support the staff by performing a variety of administrative and technical
support functions and duties that are important to the work of the
organization. One of the main duties of
the AS is the maintenance of the Time and Attendance records, as well as other
sensitive personnel information. The AS works closely with and communicates
with key Departmental staff, executives of other Federal agencies, members of
congress, and executives from public housing authorities. S/he handles all correspondence, such as
acknowledgment letters, requests for additional information and transmittal
memorandum, all containing references, dates and citations, which require
researching and extracting information from files, records and regulations.
In
accordance with Circular A-76 (see Appendix 2, paragraph G(3) of OMB Circular
No. A-76 Revised Supplemental Handbook), the definition of this activity as a
commercial activity violates the precedent established with this inventory. The activities under Function Code D000 are
assigned a reason code of I (Inherently Governmental) at other places in the
inventory (compare Sequence Number 403, et al to 992, et al). Therefore, as a matter of consistency and
for reason of established precedent, all activities with Function code D000
should be designated as Inherently Governmental.
3.
The employees who
perform this function exert ultimate control over the acquisition, use, or
disposition of the property, real or personal, tangible or intangible, of the
United States, including the collection, control, or disbursement of
appropriated and other Federal funds, as described in the Detailed Description
of Duties set out herein below.
Maintaining this function as inherently governmental ensures in using
the products of these contracts, that any final agency action complies with the
laws and policies of the United States.
Description of duties and
relation to inherently governmental standards
for D606 Asset Appraisal and
Valuation
In
fiscal year 2001, the Office of Multifamily Housing provided $4.34 billion in
mortgage insurance to 470 multifamily housing developments, 67 assisted living
facilities, 135 nursing homes and 5 mobile home parks. This is an average of $6.4 million per development
insured. Failure on even a small number
of developments results in significant loss.
Although
the title of Appraiser can be found in the private sector, the work performed
by the HUD Appraiser is significantly different. The HUD position performs inherently governmental duties designed
to protect taxpayers’ assets, whereas the private-industry Appraiser serves
mainly to facilitate private financial transactions.
HUD
Appraisers are primarily concerned with monitoring and compliance-assurance
activities that involve the application and interpretation of HUD statutes,
regulations, handbooks, guidelines and directives. The focus of these activities is to serve the taxpayers by
protecting the FHA Mortgage Insurance funds and HUD direct lending programs
against fraud, waste and abuse, and to help assure an adequate supply of safe,
affordable housing.
The mortgagees, mortgagors, builders, developers and appraisers
that perform work on loans submitted for FHA mortgage insurance are
profit-motivated and seek a government guarantee that they will not suffer from
any mortgage loan default that may occur.
Should a default occur, the mortgagee will seek to have the outstanding
mortgage paid by the FHA mortgage insurance fund. Further, because these are non-recourse loans, FHA may not pursue
the mortgagor’s other assets to cover losses that may be sustained.
Similarly, although mortgagors in the direct lending programs
(such as the Section 202 and 811 programs) are non-profit, they too seek a
government guarantee that they will not suffer from any mortgage loan default
that may occur. Should a default occur,
HUD will cover the losses. HUD will not
pursue the mortgagor’s other assets to cover losses that may be sustained.
The public’s interest is secured only by the real estate, not
by any other asset of the mortgagor or mortgagee. Under these circumstances, the work of the HUD Appraiser is
central to the protection of the public’s interest.
More
specifically, the Asset Appraisal and Valuation position involves the following
activities:
Upon discovery
of non-compliance with the various HUD requirements, Appraisers must then
undertake a variety of corrective actions.
These include the following:
HUD Appraisers also perform the
following duties:
The following tasks are also
performed by HUD Appraisers:
With regard to environmental
reviews, Phase I reviews are currently done by third party environmental
contractors, but HUD staff must review and complete the 4128 Environmental
Analysis form and determine the acceptability of each site. By regulation, the environmental reviews are
the responsibility of HUD officials.
See 24 C.F.R. 50.11, et al.
Regarding the above-described
multiple duties of the HUD Appraiser, these duties do not stand alone, but must
be integrated to form the basis for decisions.
Merging all of these compliance, monitoring, and oversight functions may
reveal conflicts with government directives or regulations. The function of forming decisions, merging
technical data, resolving conflicts, or finding them irresolvable, is an
integral part of protecting FHA insurance funds and HUD’s direct lending
programs. If not done properly, the
result can be the commitment of mortgage insurance where there should be none,
or the failure to insure where it should be done. This not only adversely affects the FHA insurance funds and HUD
direct lending programs; it also harms
families, neighborhoods and communities.
Additionally, the Appraiser works as
part of an underwriting team during the development process. Contracting this work to a contractor
located outside of the office and who will only perform certain functions
provided for in the statement of work will result in a disjointed and fractured
development process. This would
necessarily reduce the quality of project underwriting and increase the risk to
the FHA insurance funds and HUD’s direct lending programs.
It should also be noted
that, for many borrowers, FHA mortgage insurance is mortgage insurance of last
resort. Transactions that are dismissed
outright in the conventional private sector will often be found on FHA’s
doorstep. Therefore, FHA mortgage
applications require more, not less, scrutiny than conventional mortgage
applications.
The
risk to the insurance fund is also undermined by the possibility—indeed the
inevitability—of conflict of interest concerns that will occur because the same
pool of contractors will serve both HUD and the lender community whose projects
are under review. The number of
contract appraisers willing to perform HUD multifamily appraisals is
limited. The pool of appraisers
specializing in health care facilities (a big part of HUD’s multifamily
insurance business) is even more restricted.
Both HUD and the lender community it serves will hire from the same
limited pool of available contractors.
Inevitably, the HUD contractor who is reviewing the application package
of a lender will also seek commissions from the same lender for future
cases. Reviewing appraisals and market
studies is a lucrative business for a private contractor; performing these studies for the lender
(HUD’s client) is even more lucrative.
Privatizing the position of staff multifamily appraiser invites the
obvious conflict of interest problems that will occur when a contractor reviews
the case of a lender he hopes may employ him.
HUD’s (and the taxpayers’) interests are sure to be a casualty.
HUD
Appraisers are not just insulated from conflict of interests because they work
for only HUD. They are further
insulated because they are required to fill out annual financial disclosure
statements and complete periodic standard of conduct courses both in connection
with their positions at HUD and their licenses from state regulatory
bodies.
The
challenges regarding conflict of interest, the need for underwriting team work
and the inherent increased risk of FHA underwriting are compounded by the fact
that the Direct Endorsement program in Single Family and the Multifamily
Accelerated Processing (MAP) program in Multifamily come as close as possible
to placing the FHA Mortgage Insurance Funds entirely in the hands of the
private sector. The only safeguards
protecting the public at this time are the underwriting technical reviews,
appraisal reviews, and related functions performed by qualified HUD/FHA staff.
With
regard to MAP, it is the FHA multifamily insurance application processing
method of choice for the department.
The agency uses MAP in greater and greater proportions. Rather than using HUD employees or
contractors working for HUD, the mortgagee seeking mortgage insurance provides
the technical reviews. HUD staff then
review the technical reviews submitted by the mortgagee and it’s contractors.
The
MAP process is already paper-thin close to resulting in violations of HUD
regulations at 24 C.F.R. Section 200.145(b) which state:
Any
appraisals, inspections, environmental assessments and technical or financial
evaluations conducted by or for the Commissioner are performed to determine the
maximum insurable mortgage, and to protect the Commissioner and the FHA insurance
funds.
It cannot be argued that
technical reviews contracted for by the hopeful beneficiary of the FHA mortgage
insurance program are “conducted by or for the Commissioner.” These reviews, bought and paid for by the
mortgagee, are for the benefit of the mortgagee. Nonetheless, these technical reviews are used to determine the
maximum insurable mortgage, and they are used to protect the FHA insurance
fund.
MAP is about as close as you can get to fully bestowing
the FHA insurance fund solely in the hands of the private sector without
crossing the line of acceptability. The
only thing that saves MAP from being in violation of the regulations is the
review of the mortgagee technical reviews by qualified HUD/FHA technicians. To contract out the Appraisal and Valuation
function would result in no real FHA review of this mortgagee technical
review. At an average cost of $6.4
million per development, the costs to the insurance fund can increase quickly.
HUD’s experience with the Traditional Application Process
(TAP) is illustrative of the results of contracting out technical review
functions. TAP relies upon HUD
employees to directly appraise, underwrite and review architectural and
engineering plans. In the 1990s, HUD
engaged in small procurement contracting known as “delegated processing” to
provide these services. HUD employees
who were specialists in underwriting, valuation, construction analysis, etc.,
reviewed the contractors’ work.
Contractors worked directly for and were paid by HUD. Although each individual contract was small,
the total cost was far in excess of the cost of doing the work in house. Additionally, contracting out and then
reviewing contractor’s work often made the mortgage insurance application
process slow. It is highly likely that
this would repeat itself if the MAP technical reviews were contracted out.
Finally,
allowing contractors to do these functions would necessarily result in the
release of information that is confidential commercial and financial
information, and would potentially harm the competitive abilities of mortgagors
and mortgagees who do business with HUD.
Data submitted as part of regular monitoring and asset management
reveals business sources, estimated costs of doing business and other
information that rivals could use to competitive advantage. Corporations do not have rights under the
Privacy Act to insist the government not disclose information. But we have specifically recognized a
business’s right to have information declared exempt from disclosure under the
Freedom of Information Act when it is confidential commercial or financial
information. This declaration lasts for
ten years (24 C.F.R. Section 15.108).
While FOIA would not preclude the agency from releasing this information
to a contractor working for the agency, it should be used as an indication of
the high level of confidentiality HUD regularly affords this sort of
information. Allowing access to this
confidential information by persons other than Federal employees would
jeopardize the legitimate business interests of the agency’s clients.
Conclusion:
D606 Asset Appraisal and Valuation
Maintaining
this function as inherently governmental ensures that any final agency action
complies with the laws and policies of the United States. Maintaining it as inherently governmental
ensures that decisions reflect the independent conclusions of agency officials
and not those of contractors who may have interests that are not in concert
with the public interest, and may be beyond the reach of management controls
otherwise applicable to public employees.
Additionally, this will ensure that the decisions made by these
employees reflect the independent conclusions of agency officials.
Additionally, the
work performed under this category involves access to confidential business
information. Access by other than an
employee of the federal government would compromise legitimate business
interests of the agency’s clients. It
would impede governmental authority and disrupt the procurement process.
D709
Mortgage Underwriting
3.
The employees who
perform this function exert ultimate control over the acquisition, use, or
disposition of the property, real or personal, tangible or intangible, of the
United States, including the collection, control, or disbursement of appropriated
and other Federal funds, as described in the Detailed Description of Duties set
out herein below. Maintaining this
function as inherently governmental ensures in using the products of these
contracts, that any final agency action complies with the laws and policies of
the United States.
Description of duties and
relation to inherently governmental standards
for D709 Mortgage
Underwriting
In
fiscal year 2001, the Office of Multifamily Housing provided $4.34 billion in
mortgage insurance to 470 multifamily housing developments, 67 assisted living
facilities, 135 nursing homes and 5 mobile home parks. This is an average of $6.4 million per
development insured. Failure on even a
small number of developments results in significant loss.
Although
the title of Mortgage Underwriter can be found in the private sector, the work
performed by the HUD Mortgage Underwriter is significantly different. The HUD position performs inherently
governmental duties designed to protect taxpayers’ assets, whereas the
private-industry Mortgage Underwriter serves mainly to facilitate private
financial transactions.
HUD
Mortgage Underwriters are primarily concerned with monitoring and
compliance-assurance activities that involve the application and interpretation
of HUD statutes, regulations, handbooks, guidelines and directives. The focus of these activities is to serve
the taxpayers by protecting the FHA Mortgage Insurance funds and HUD’s direct
lending programs against fraud, waste and abuse, and to help assure an adequate
supply of safe, affordable housing.
The mortgagees, mortgagors, builders, developers, underwriters
and appraisers that perform work on loans submitted for FHA mortgage insurance
are profit-motivated and seek a government guarantee that they will not suffer
from any mortgage loan default that may occur.
Should a default occur, the mortgagee will seek to have the outstanding
mortgage paid by the FHA mortgage insurance.
Further, because these are non-recourse loans, FHA may not pursue the
mortgagor’s other assets to cover losses that may be sustained.
Similarly, although mortgagors in the direct lending programs
(such as the Section 202 and 811 programs) are non-profit, they too seek a
government guarantee that they will not suffer from any mortgage loan default
that may occur. Should a default occur,
HUD will cover the losses. HUD will not
pursue the mortgagor’s other assets to cover losses that may be sustained.
The public’s interest is secured only by the real estate, not
by any other asset of the mortgagor or mortgagee. Under these circumstances, the work of the HUD Mortgage
Underwriter is central to the protection of the public’s interest.
More
specifically, the Mortgage Underwriting position involves the following
activities:
a. Acquiring and analyzing facts and utilizing sound
judgment in applying legal and technical standards to these facts;
b. Analyzing the pertinent regulations;
c. Determining whether the appraisers’ and mortgagees'
practices comply with the regulations;
d. Recommending appropriate actions to correct
noncompliance;
e. Monitoring subsequent appraiser and mortgagee
activities to ensure the prescribed corrective steps have been taken; and
f.
Writing review reports
summarizing all findings and recommendations.
Upon
discovery of non-compliance with the various HUD requirements, Mortgage
Underwriters must then undertake a variety of corrective actions. These include the following:
a. Issuing Notices of Deficiency or similar statements
informing the program participants of non-compliance;
b. Determining whether a given mortgage loan is insurable
under HUD standards;
c. Directing the issuance of Notices of Return
(non-endorsement notices) where loans are found to be noncompliant with FHA
insuring requirements;
d. Acquiring and analyzing facts and utilizing sound
judgment in applying legal and technical standards to these facts;
e. Analyzing the pertinent regulations;
f.
Determining whether the
appraisers’ and mortgagees' practices comply with the regulations;
g. Recommending appropriate actions to correct
noncompliance;
h. Monitoring subsequent appraiser and mortgagee
activities to ensure the prescribed corrective steps have been taken; and
i.
Writing review reports
summarizing all findings and recommendations.
HUD Mortgage Underwriters also
perform the following duties:
a.
Evaluating and
monitoring Appraisal Quality Assessments (AQAs), appraisal field reviews, and
underwriting technical reviews;
b.
Acting as the Government
Technical Representative on contract for field reviews, underwriting technical
reviews, and similar contracts;
c. Evaluating the credentials of FHA fee inspectors and
203(k) rehabilitation-loan consultants to determine whether the applicants
should be placed on FHA’s roster of these positions;
d.
Monitoring lenders’ and appraisers’
compliance with 203(k) rehabilitation loan requirements;
e.
Approving or denying
appraiser’s applications for placement on the FHA roster;
f.
Reviewing and approving
condominiums and planned unit developments for FHA insurance eligibility;
g.
Evaluating lenders’
requests for waivers regarding property condition and other requirements; and
h.
Answering heavy volumes
of technical questions in telephone and electronic mail communications from
lenders, appraisers, other real estate professionals, and the general
public.
The following tasks are also
performed by the HUD Mortgage Underwriter:
a.
Answering Congressional
Inquiries;
b.
Responding to requests
under the Freedom of Information Act;
c.
Working with HUD and GAO
auditors and inspectors in the review and monitoring of HUD/FHA programs;
d.
Analyzing the
requirements of construction, processing procedures, escrow procedures, and all
other issues related to the physical asset that secures insured loans;
e.
Advising
and educating appraisers, lenders, other real estate professionals, and the
public concerning HUD standards and requirements for direct endorsement
mortgage insurance approval and the principles of underwriting;
f.
Answering questions from
homeowners with delinquent FHA loans;
g.
Counseling and advising
homeowners of all pertinent options and available resources in order to avoid
or cure mortgage defaults, and thereby help them avoid potential homelessness;
h.
Developing creative
approaches to present HUD programs to individuals and groups from diverse
backgrounds, often in the context of highly sensitive and controversial
issues;
i.
Communicating
effectively, orally and in writing, with HUD clients, local government
officials, citizen groups, counseling agencies, attorneys, and the public at
large on a wide variety of matters; and
j.
Developing and
presenting training seminars for mortgage lenders, appraisers, underwriters,
and other program participants concerning FHA underwriting and loan production
topics, including Section 203(k) rehabilitation loans.
The above-described multiple duties
of the HUD Mortgage Underwriter do not stand alone, but must be integrated to
form the basis for decisions. Merging
all of these compliance, monitoring, and oversight functions may reveal
conflicts with government directives or regulations. The function of forming decisions, merging technical data,
resolving conflicts, or finding them irresolvable, is an integral part of
protecting FHA insurance funds and HUD’s direct lending programs. If not done properly, the result can be the
commitment of mortgage insurance where there should be none, or the failure to
insure where it should be done. This
not only adversely affects the FHA insurance funds and HUD direct lending programs; it also harms families, neighborhoods and
communities.
Additionally, the Mortgage
Underwriter works as part of an underwriting team during the development
process. Contracting this work to a
contractor located outside of the office and who will only perform certain functions
provided for in the statement of work will result in a disjointed and fractured
development process. This would
necessarily reduce the quality of project underwriting and increase the risk to
the FHA insurance funds and HUD’s direct lending programs.
It should also be noted
that, for many borrowers, FHA mortgage insurance is mortgage insurance of last
resort. Transactions that are dismissed
outright in the conventional private sector will often be found on FHA’s
doorstep. Therefore, FHA mortgage
applications require more, not less, scrutiny than conventional mortgage
applications.
These
challenges are compounded by the fact that the Direct Endorsement program in
Single Family and the Mortgage Accelerated Processing (MAP) program in
Multifamily come as close as possible to placing the FHA Mortgage Insurance
Funds entirely in the hands of the private sector. The only safeguards protecting the public at this time are the
underwriting technical reviews, appraisal reviews, and related functions
performed by qualified HUD/FHA staff.
With
regard to MAP, it is the FHA multifamily insurance application processing
method of choice for the department.
The agency uses MAP in greater and greater proportions. Rather than using HUD employees or
contractors working for HUD, the mortgagee seeking mortgage insurance provides
the technical reviews. HUD staff then
review the technical reviews submitted by the mortgagee and it’s contractors.
The
MAP process is already paper-thin close to resulting in violations of HUD
regulations at 24 C.F.R. Section 200.145(b) which state:
Any
appraisals, inspections, environmental assessments and technical or financial
evaluations conducted by or for the Commissioner are performed to determine the
maximum insurable mortgage, and to protect the Commissioner and the FHA
insurance funds.
It cannot be argued that
technical reviews contracted for by the hopeful beneficiary of the FHA mortgage
insurance program are “conducted by or for the Commissioner.” These reviews, bought and paid for by the mortgagee,
are for the benefit of the mortgagee.
Nonetheless, these technical reviews are used to determine the maximum
insurable mortgage, and they are used to protect the FHA insurance fund.
MAP is about as close as you can get to fully bestowing
the FHA insurance fund solely in the hands of the private sector without
crossing the line of acceptability. The
only thing that saves MAP from being in violation of the regulations is the
review of the mortgagee technical reviews by qualified HUD/FHA technicians. To contract out the Mortgage Underwriting
function would result in no real FHA review of this mortgagee technical
review. At an average cost of $6.4
million per development, the costs to the insurance fund can increase quickly.
HUD’s experience with the Traditional Application Process
(TAP) is illustrative of the results of contracting out technical review
functions. TAP relies upon HUD
employees to directly appraise, underwrite and review architectural and engineering
plans. In the 1990s, HUD engaged in
small procurement contracting known as “delegated processing” to provide these
services. HUD employees who were
specialists in underwriting, valuation, construction analyses, etc., reviewed
the contractors’ work. Contractors
worked directly for and were paid by HUD.
Although each individual contract was small, the total cost was far in
excess of the cost of doing the work in house.
Additionally, contracting out and then reviewing contractor’s work often
made the mortgage insurance application process slow. It is highly likely that this would repeat itself if the MAP
technical reviews were contracted out.
Finally,
allowing contractors to do these functions would necessarily result in the
release of information that is confidential commercial and financial
information, and would potentially harm the competitive abilities of mortgagors
and mortgagees who do business with HUD.
Data submitted as part of regular monitoring and asset management
reveals business sources, estimated costs of doing business and other
information that rivals could use to competitive advantage. Corporations do not have rights under the
Privacy Act to insist the government not disclose information. But we have specifically recognized a
business’s right to have information declared exempt from disclosure under the
Freedom of Information Act when it is confidential commercial or financial
information. This declaration lasts for
ten years (24 C.F.R. Section 15.108).
While FOIA would not preclude the agency from releasing this information
to a contractor working for the agency, it should be used as an indication of
the high level of confidentiality HUD regularly affords this sort of
information. Allowing access to this
confidential information by persons other than Federal employees would
jeopardize the legitimate business interests of the agency’s clients.
Conclusion:
D709 Mortgage Underwriting
Maintaining
this function as inherently governmental ensures that any final agency action
complies with the laws and policies of the United States. Maintaining it as inherently governmental
ensures that decisions reflect the independent conclusions of agency officials
and not those of contractors who may have interests that are not in concert
with the public interest, and may be beyond the reach of management controls
otherwise applicable to public employees.
Additionally, this will ensure that the decisions made by these
employees reflect the independent conclusions of agency officials.
Additionally, the
work performed under this category involves access to confidential business
information. Access by other than an
employee of the federal government would compromise legitimate business
interests of the agency’s clients. It
would impede governmental authority and disrupt the procurement process.
Assistant Secretary for
Housing-Federal Housing Commissioner A-76/FAIR Act Inventory:
1.
The employees serving in positions indicated by this function code are engaged
in activities that bind the United States to take or not to take some action by
contract, policy, regulation, authorization, and/or order, as described in the
Detailed Description of Duties set out herein below. These activities require the exercise of discretion involving
monetary transactions and entitlements.
By defining this function as inherently governmental, the agency will
guarantee that any final agency action complies with the laws and policies of
the United States. Additionally, this will ensure that the decisions performed
by these employees reflect the independent conclusions of agency officials.
2.
The employees who perform this function have access to competition and
procurement sensitive information, as described in the Detailed Description of
Duties set out herein below. This
function necessitates the use of discretion with regard to monetary
transactions and entitlements. Access
to this sensitive information by a non-federal employee would compromise the
integrity of future competitions, contracts, and procurement actions. It would impede governmental authority and
disrupt the procurement process. In
addition, releasing to a contractor the information necessary to accomplish the
function will result in contractor access to confidential business information.
3. The employees who perform this function exert ultimate control
over the acquisition, use, or disposition of the property, real or personal,
tangible or intangible, of the United States, including the collection,
control, or disbursement of appropriated and other Federal funds, as described
in the Detailed Description of Duties set out herein below. Maintaining this function as inherently
governmental ensures in using the products of these contracts, that any final
agency action complies with the laws and policies of the United States.
Description of duties and
relation to inherently governmental standards
for D708 Application
Receipt/Processing
In
fiscal year 2001, the Office of Multifamily Housing provided $4.34 billion in
mortgage insurance to 470 multifamily housing developments, 67 assisted living
facilities, 135 nursing homes and 5 mobile home parks. This is an average of $6.4 million per
development insured. Failure on even a
small number of developments results in significant loss.
HUD’s
employees involved in Application Receipt and Processing are primarily
concerned with monitoring and compliance-assurance activities that involve the
application and interpretation of HUD statutes, regulations, handbooks,
guidelines and directives. The focus of
these activities is to serve the taxpayers by protecting the FHA Mortgage
Insurance funds and HUD’s direct lending programs against fraud, waste and
abuse, and to help assure an adequate supply of safe, affordable housing.
The mortgagees, mortgagors, builders, developers, underwriters
and appraisers that perform work on loans submitted for FHA mortgage insurance
are profit-motivated and seek a government guarantee that they will not suffer
from any mortgage loan default that may occur.
Should a default occur, the mortgagee will seek to have the outstanding
mortgage paid by the FHA mortgage insurance.
Further, because these are non-recourse loans, FHA may not pursue the
mortgagor’s other assets to cover losses that may be sustained.
Similarly, although mortgagors in the direct lending programs
(such as the Section 202 and 811 programs) are non-profit, they too seek a
government guarantee that they will not suffer from any mortgage loan default
that may occur. Should a default occur,
HUD will cover the losses. HUD will not
pursue the mortgagor’s other assets to cover losses that may be sustained.
The public’s interest is secured only by the real estate, not
by any other asset of the mortgagor or mortgagee. HUD employees involved in the receipt and processing of
applications serve at the fulcrum of the decision making process regarding both
FHA insurance and HUD direct loan programs.
Under these circumstances, their work is central to the protection of
the public’s interest.
More
specifically, the Application Receipt/Processing position involves the
following activities:
The Application Receipt/Processing
position is more than a mere paper pusher.
This position gathers the technical reviews provided by the Mortgage
Underwriter, Appraiser and Architect/Engineer, and puts them together to form
the basis for a recommendation for agency action. From his/her position, an overview of technical reviews may
reveal conflicts between them, or disclose conflicts with government directives
or regulations. The function of forming
decisions, merging technical data, resolving conflicts or finding them
irresolvable is an integral part of protecting FHA insurance funds and HUD’s
direct loan programs. It not done
properly, the result can be the commitment of mortgage insurance or funding
reservation where there should be none, or the failure to insure or reserve
funds where it should be done.
The Application Receipt/Processing
position works as the fulcrum of the underwriting team during the development
process. Contracting this work to a contractor located outside the office and
who will only perform certain functions provided for in the statement of work
will result in a disjointed and fractured development process. This would necessarily reduce the quality of
underwriting and increase the risk to the FHA insurance funds and HUD’s direct
loan programs.
Finally,
allowing contractors to do these functions would necessarily result in the
release of information that is confidential commercial and financial
information, and would potentially harm the competitive abilities of mortgagors
and mortgagees who do business with HUD.
Data submitted as part of regular monitoring and asset management
reveals business sources, estimated costs of doing business and other
information that rivals could use to competitive advantage. Corporations do not have rights under the
Privacy Act to insist the government not disclose information. But we have specifically recognized a
business’s right to have information declared exempt from disclosure under the
Freedom of Information Act when it is confidential commercial or financial
information. This declaration lasts for
ten years (24 C.F.R. Section 15.108).
While FOIA would not preclude the agency from releasing this information
to a contractor working for the agency, it should be used as an indication of
the high level of confidentiality HUD regularly affords this sort of
information. Allowing access to this
confidential information by persons other than Federal employees would
jeopardize the legitimate business interests of the agency’s clients.
Conclusion:
D708 Application Receipt/Processing
Maintaining
this function as inherently governmental ensures that any final agency action
complies with the laws and policies of the United States. Maintaining it as inherently governmental
ensures that decisions reflect the independent conclusions of agency officials
and not those of contractors who may have interests that are not in concert
with the public interest, and may be beyond the reach of management controls
otherwise applicable to public employees.
Additionally, this will ensure that the decisions made by these
employees reflect the independent conclusions of agency officials.
Additionally, the
work performed under this category involves access to confidential business
information. Access by other than an
employee of the federal government would compromise legitimate business
interests of the agency’s clients. It
would impede governmental authority and disrupt the procurement process.
Assistant Secretary for Housing-Federal Housing Commissioner
A-76/FAIR Act Inventory:
T804 Architect-Engineering
1. The employees serving in positions indicated
by this function code must have technical skills
found in their colleagues in the private sector. However, while the technical knowledge of design and construction
is critical to the performance of their duties, the essence of their function
is to make value judgments regarding the suitability of proposed designs and
construction for government programs.
Their reviews constitute value judgments in making decisions for the
Federal Government. Thus they are engaged in activities that bind the United
States to take or not to take some action by contract, policy, regulation,
authorization, and/or order, as described in the Detailed Description of Duties
set out herein below. These activities
also require the exercise of discretion
involving monetary transactions and entitlements. By defining this function as inherently governmental, the agency
will guarantee that any final agency action complies with the laws and policies
of the United States. Additionally, this will ensure that the decisions
performed by these employees reflect the independent conclusions of agency
officials.
2. The employees who perform this function have
access to competition and procurement sensitive information, as described in
the Detailed Description of Duties set out herein below. This function necessitates the use of
discretion with regard to monetary transactions and entitlements. Access to this sensitive information by a
non-federal employee would compromise the integrity of future competitions,
contracts, and procurement actions. It
would impede governmental authority and disrupt the procurement process. In addition, releasing to a contractor the
information necessary to accomplish the function will result in contractor
access to confidential business information.
3. The employees who perform this function engage in the inherently
governmental exercise of discretion in the application of governmental
authority as they must review and comment on the suitability of actions which
exert ultimate control over the acquisition, use, or disposition of the
property, real or personal, tangible or intangible, of the United States,
including the collection, control, or disbursement of appropriated and other
Federal funds, as described in the Detailed Description of Duties set out
herein below. Maintaining this function
as inherently governmental ensures in using the products of these contracts,
that any final agency action complies with the laws and policies of the United
States.
Description of duties and relation to inherently
governmental standards for
for T804 Architect-Engineering
HUD
design professionals categorized as “Architect-Engineering” include architects,
engineers, cost analysts, and construction analysts. These all are primarily concerned
with monitoring and compliance-assurance activities that involve the
application and interpretation of HUD statutes, regulations, handbooks,
guidelines, and directives. The focus
of these positions is to serve the taxpayers by protecting the FHA Mortgage
Insurance Funds and HUD direct loan programs against fraud, waste, and abuse,
and to help assure an adequate supply of safe, affordable housing.
There
is little similarity between the HUD position and the design professional position in private industry, aside from the
position titles, as demonstrated by the detailed description of position duties
set outbelow. The HUD position performs
inherently governmental duties designed to protect taxpayers’ assets, whereas
the private-industry position serves mainly to facilitate private financial
transactions.
Asset
Development: The
mortgage lenders, design professionals, developers, and appraisers that perform
work on loans submitted for FHA mortgage insurance are profit-motivated and
seek a government guarantee that they will not suffer from any mortgage loan
default that may occur. Should a
default occur, the mortgagee lender will seek to have the outstanding mortgage
paid by the FHA mortgage insurance.
The
public’s interest is secured only by the real estate, not by any other assets
of the mortgagor or mortgagee. Under
these circumstances, the mortgage underwriting, design, and property appraisal
reviews are of truly critical value.
In fiscal year 2001, the Office of
Multifamily Housing provided $4.34 billion in mortgage insurance to 470
multifamily housing developments, 67 assisted living facilities, 135 nursing
homes and 5 mobile home parks. This is
an average of $6.4 million per development insured. Failure on even a small number of developments results in
significant loss.
Asset Management: Once an asset is under an FHA
mortgage, the owner of the asset must comply with the regulatory agreement
signed at closing. This agreement
authorizes HUD to monitor the management of the property, including
disbursement of funds and maintenance of the physical structures. Such oversight assures that both the
financial condition of the project and the physical structures that stand as
security for the mortgage will be maintained in a manner that protects the
public interest. Architects, engineers,
cost analysts and construction analysts in this category are called upon to
review and approve designs, proposals, repairs, contracts, and disbursements
related to the operation and management of the project to see that such
activities will not only protect the value of the assets but also fulfill the
mission, goals, and priorities of the Department of Housing in providing
decent, safe, sanitary, and affordable housing. This process requires an intimate knowledge of HUD programs and
regulations, as well as a firm grasp on principles of sound and cost-effective
design and construction.
More specifically, the
Architect/Engineer position involves the following activities:
a. Acquiring and analyzing facts and utilizing sound judgment in applying legal and technical standards to these facts;
b. Analyzing
the pertinent regulations;
c. Determining
whether the designers’ and contractors’
practices comply with the regulations;
d.
Recommending appropriate actions to correct noncompliance;
e. Monitoring
subsequent contractor, owner, and mortgagee activities to ensure the prescribed
corrective steps have been taken;
f. Writing
review reports summarizing all findings and recommendations; and
g. Representing the Department at meetings with owners,
developers, architects and engineers, mortgagees, contractors, state and local
government entities, and tenant organizations, to express and interpret the
Department’s requirements, practices, and priorities related to the design,
construction, rehabilitation, maintenance, and repair of housing
structures.
Upon
discovery of non-compliance with the various HUD requirements, HUD architects
and engineers must then undertake a
variety of corrective actions. These
include the following:
a. Providing a
written description of the non-compliance for review and use of the HUD official authorized to act on behalf
of the government;
b. Determining
whether a given mortgage loan is insurable under HUD standards;
c. Determining whether a given proposal
for a property under management meets regulatory requirements under HUD
standards;
d. Reviewing
and referring insured cases found to be noncompliant for indemnification in the
event of a claim by the insured lender;
e. Assisting
in the preparation of Limited Denials of Participation in FHA programs against
designers, contractors, fee inspectors, and other participants found to have
been significantly noncompliant;
f. Assembling
data and administrative records for administrative hearings, including those
before Administrative Law Judges or Federal Courts;
g.
Recommending the removal of designers and contractors from the approved
participants’ list for the Multifamily Accelerated Processing program; and
h.
Recommending debarment of program participants.
Architects and Engineers also
perform the following duties:
a. Review of
documents at closings for compliance with government regulations and to see
that the interests of the public are protected;
b. Acting as
the Government Technical Representative on contract for field reviews,
underwriting technical reviews, and similar contracts;
c. Acting as a liaison between the
Department and private industry design professionals, including advising these
parties regarding the design and program requirements of the Department;
d. Reviewing
field reports of private contractors who have been hired to inspect
construction of FHA-insured projects and Section 202 and 811 projects;
e. Reviewing
construction draw requests to see that amounts requested are reasonable and
that sufficient funds will be available to complete the work;
f. Monitoring
lenders’ and designers’ compliance with FHA loan requirements, including those
of the Multifamily Accelerated Processing (MAP) program;
g. Approving or denying appraiser’s
applications for placement on the FHA roster;
h. Reviewing
and approving reports by private-industry design professionals for accuracy,
competency, and relevency. Such review
often mediates between conflicting professional opinions and provides judgment
regarding the acceptance, rejection, and interpretation of such opinions;
i. Monitoring
and reporting on the performance of both HUD employees and private entities
with regard to specific Management Plan goals;
j. Maintaining
and accessing data bases of information on projects and participants for
management and oversight purposes and in response to FOIAs and congressional inquiries;
k. Evaluating
owners’ requests for the disbursement of funds regarding property condition and
other requirements; and
l. Answering
heavy volumes of technical questions in telephone and electronic mail
communications from lenders, appraisers, other real estate professionals, and
the general public.
The
following tasks are also performed by HUD architects and engineers:
a. Answering Congressional Inquiries;
b. Responding to requests under the Freedom of
Information Act;
c. Analyzing the requirements of construction,
processing procedures, escrow procedures, and all other issues related to the
physical asset that secures insured loans;
d.
Advising and educating appraisers, lenders, other real estate
professionals, and the public concerning HUD standards and requirements for
direct endorsement mortgage insurance approval and the principles of
underwriting;
e. Counseling
and advising project owners of all pertinent options and available resources in
order to avoid or cure mortgage defaults, and thereby help them avoid potential
homelessness;
f. Developing
creative approaches to present HUD programs to individuals and groups from
diverse backgrounds, often in the context of highly sensitive and controversial
issues;
g. Providing
advice and assistance to HUD attorneys, managers, public affairs officers, and
enforcement officials regarding sensitive and critical issues where the
condition of building structures and the advisability of various options is
critical to the situation;
h.
Communicating effectively, orally and in writing, with HUD clients,
local government officials, citizen groups, counseling agencies, attorneys, and
the public at large on a wide variety of matters; and
i. Developing
and presenting training seminars for mortgage lenders, architects, engineers,
contractors, underwriters, and other program participants concerning FHA
underwriting and loan production topics.
The above-described multiple duties
of the HUD/Housing design professionals do not stand alone, but must be
integrated to form the basis for a decision.
Merging all of these compliance, monitoring, and oversight functions may
reveal conflicts with government directives or regulations. The function of forming decisions, merging
technical data, resolving conflicts, or finding them irresolvable, is an
integral part of protecting FHA insurance funds and HUD direct loan
programs. If not done properly, the
result can be the commitment of mortgage insurance or funding reservation where
there should be none, or the deterioration, misuse, or other degradation of the
physical asset. This not only adversely
affects the FHA insurance funds and HUD direct loan programs; it also harms families, neighborhoods and
communities.
Additionally, during the development
process, Architects and Engineers work as part of an underwriting team. Contracting this work to a contractor
located outside of the office who will only perform certain functions provided
for in the statement of work will result in a disjointed and fractured
development process. This would
necessarily reduce the quality of project underwriting and increase the risk to
the FHA insurance funds and HUD’s direct lending programs.
It should also be noted
that, for many borrowers, FHA mortgage insurance is mortgage insurance of last
resort. Transactions that are dismissed
outright in the conventional private sector will often be found on FHA’s
doorstep. Therefore, FHA mortgage
applications require more, not less, scrutiny than conventional mortgage
applications.
On
the development side, these challenges are compounded by the fact that the
Multifamily Accelerated Processing (MAP) program in Multifamily comes as close
as possible to placing the FHA Mortgage Insurance Funds entirely in the hands
of the private sector. The only
safeguards protecting the public at this time are the underwriting technical
reviews, appraisal reviews, and related functions performed by qualified
HUD/FHA staff.
With
regard to MAP, it is the FHA multifamily insurance application processing
method of choice for the department.
The agency uses MAP in greater and greater proportions. Rather than using HUD employees or
contractors working for HUD, the mortgagee seeking mortgage insurance provides
the technical reviews. HUD staff then
review the technical reviews submitted by the mortgagee and it’s contractors.
The
MAP process is already paper-thin close to resulting in violations of HUD
regulations at 24 C.F.R. Section 200.145(b) which state:
Any
appraisals, inspections, environmental assessments and technical or financial
evaluations conducted by or for the Commissioner are performed to determine the
maximum insurable mortgage, and to protect the Commissioner and the FHA
insurance funds.
It cannot be argued that
technical reviews contracted for by the hopeful beneficiary of the FHA mortgage
insurance program are “conducted by or for the Commissioner.” These reviews, bought and paid for by the
mortgagee, are for the benefit of the mortgagee. Nonetheless, these technical reviews are used to determine the
maximum insurable mortgage, and they are used to protect the FHA insurance
fund.
MAP is about as close as you can get to fully bestowing
the FHA insurance fund solely in the hands of the private sector without
crossing the line of acceptability. The
only thing that saves MAP from being in violation of the regulations is the
review of the mortgagee technical reviews by qualified HUD/FHA
technicians. To contract out the
Architectural and Engineering function would result in no real FHA review of
this mortgagee technical review. At an
average cost of $6.4 million per development, the costs to the insurance fund
can increase quickly.
HUD’s experience with the Traditional Application Process
(TAP) is illustrative of the results of contracting out technical review
functions. TAP relies upon HUD
employees to directly appraise, underwrite and review architectural and
engineering plans. In the 1990s, HUD
engaged in small procurement contracting known as “delegated processing” to
provide these services. HUD employees
who were specialists in underwriting, valuation, construction analyses, etc.,
reviewed the contractors’ work.
Contractors worked directly for and were paid by HUD. Although each individual contract was small,
the total cost was far in excess of the cost of doing the work in house. Additionally, contracting out and then
reviewing contractor’s work often made the mortgage insurance application
process slow. It is highly likely that
this would repeat itself if the MAP technical reviews were contracted out.
Finally,
allowing contractors to do these functions would necessarily result in the
release of information that is confidential commercial and financial
information, and would potentially harm the competitive abilities of mortgagors
and mortgagees who do business with HUD.
Data submitted as part of regular monitoring and asset management
reveals business sources, estimated costs of doing business and other
information that rivals could use to competitive advantage. Corporations do not have rights under the
Privacy Act to insist the government not disclose information. But we have specifically recognized a
business’s right to have information declared exempt from disclosure under the
Freedom of Information Act when it is confidential commercial or financial
information. This declaration lasts for
ten years (24 C.F.R. Section 15.108).
While FOIA would not preclude the agency from releasing this information
to a contractor working for the agency, it should be used as an indication of
the high level of confidentiality HUD regularly affords this sort of
information. Allowing access to this
confidential information by persons other than Federal employees would
jeopardize the legitimate business interests of the agency’s clients.
Conclusion:
D804 Architect-Engineering
Maintaining
this function as inherently governmental ensures that any final agency action
complies with the laws and policies of the United States. Maintaining it as inherently governmental
ensures that decisions reflect the independent conclusions of agency officials
and not those of contractors who may have interests that are not in concert
with the public interest, and may be beyond the reach of management controls
otherwise applicable to public employees.
Additionally, this will ensure that the decisions made by these
employees reflect the independent conclusions of agency officials.
Additionally, the
work performed under this category involves access to confidential business
information. Access by other than an
employee of the federal government would compromise legitimate business
interests of the agency’s clients. It
would impede governmental authority and disrupt the procurement process.
Assistant
Secretary for Public and Indian Housing A-76/FAIR Act Inventory:
C401 Financial Analyst
1. The employees serving in positions indicated
by this function code are engaged in activities that bind the United States to
take or not to take some action by contract, policy, regulation, authorization,
and/or order, as described in the Detailed Description of Duties set out herein
below. These activities require the
exercise of discretion involving monetary transactions and entitlements. By defining this function as inherently
governmental, the agency will guarantee that any final agency action complies
with the laws and policies of the United States. Additionally, this will ensure
that the decisions performed by these employees reflect the independent
conclusions of agency officials.
2. The employees who perform this function have
access to competition and procurement sensitive information, as described in
the Detailed Description of Duties set out herein below. This function necessitates the use of
discretion with regard to monetary transactions and entitlements. Access to this sensitive information by a
non-federal employee would compromise the integrity of future competitions,
contracts, and procurement actions. It would
impede governmental authority and disrupt the procurement process. In addition, releasing to a contractor the
information necessary to accomplish the function will result in contractor
access to confidential business information.
3. The employees who perform this function exert ultimate control
over the acquisition, use, or disposition of the property, real or personal,
tangible or intangible, of the United States, including the collection,
control, or disbursement of appropriated and other Federal funds, as described
in the Detailed Description of Duties set out herein below. Maintaining this function as inherently
governmental ensures in using the products of these contracts, that any final
agency action complies with the laws and policies of the United States.
4. In accordance with Circular A-76 (see
Appendix 2, paragraph (G)(3) of OMB Circular No. A-76 Revised Supplemental
Handbook), the definition of this activity as a commercial activity violates
the precedent established with this inventory.
The activities under Function Code C401 are assigned a Reason code of
I. Therefore, as a matter of
consistency and for reason of established precedent, all activities with a
Functional Code of C401 should be designated as inherently governmental.
for C401 Financial Analyst
The
PIH Financial Analyst (FA) serves as an advisor and internal consultant for
financial matters relating to the Public Housing Agencies (PHAs) in their
portfolio. Responsibilities include
review and approval of program budgets/funding documents, obligation of funds,
scheduling of payments, and the resolution of audit findings related to the
financial management of PHAs. FAs have
monitoring and compliance duties that involve the application and interpretation
of HUD statutes, regulations, handbook, guidelines and directives. The main objective is to protect against
fraud, waste, and abuse, as well as ensuring that the public housing stock and
Section 8 units are safe and affordable.
More
specifically, the Financial Analyst position involves the following duties and
responsibilities:
1. Participates in compliance assessments of financial
areas (such as: accounting practices, procurement, etc.), collecting and
analyzing data to check for statutory and regulatory compliance;
2. Develops appropriate strategies, tools and procedures
to address identified performance deficiencies and problem solving;
3. Identifies technical assistance needs and develops
targeted technical assistance strategies to address the needs of the PHA;
4. Provides expert advice, guidance and technical
assistance to internal HUD staff, other team members and PHA staff on complex
financial management policy or operational issues;
5. Assists the Hub Director in developing and carrying
out recommendations for intervention or imposition of sanctions when the
housing authority management and local leaders fail to take actions to correct
documented financial deficiencies;
6. Coordinates and consolidates team member input for
audit resolution. Prepares draft audit
response for team review and approval and submits final report to the Hub
Director;
7. Utilizes computer/data systems, such as PIC, LOCCS,
ROBOTS, etc., to maintain current PHA data, track PHA performance trends and
compliance issues, and generate appropriate work products;
8. Develops appropriate strategies, tools, and procedures
to address identified performance deficiencies and unusually complex problems
regarding improvement efforts;
9. Serves as Hub and PIH representative at local,
regional, state and other conferences, seminars, workshops, etc., on finance
and budget issues and topics, making oral and written presentations;
10. Assists in the control, monitoring and oversight of allocations of development, subsidy and grant (DRUG, CIAP, COMP, CFP, etc.) funding for the Hub; and
11. Responds to Congressional Inquiries and Freedom of Information Act requests.
Employees who perform duties within Function Code C401
should be classified as inherently governmental under the standard identified
in OFPP Policy Letter 92-1. Their work
requires the interpretation and execution of the laws of the United States.
The Financial Analysts who perform these functions under
C-401 bind the United States to take actions by contract, policy, regulation
and authorization (through, for example, Operating Subsidy or Section 8
allocations by the Financial Analysts) under the several Public Housing
programs. Their duties include the
review and recommendation for approval of funding obligations as well as for
the recapture of unused or improperly used program funds. These activities require the exercise of a
high degree of judgment and discretion involving monetary transactions and
entitlements. Therefore, they are
inherently governmental. By defining
this function as inherently governmental, the agency will guarantee that any
final agency action complies with the laws and policies of the United
States. Additionally, this will ensure
that the decisions performed by these employees reflect the independent
conclusions of agency officials.
At the Field Office level, the employees who perform
these functions are not “back office” employees who only process financial
documents or review construction documents. Rather, they are an intrinsic part
of the oversight and monitoring process by which the Department ensures and
enforces compliance with its regulations—programmatic as well as financial.
The
employees who perform these functions have access to highly sensitive
competitive procurement information.
During monitoring reviews, the Financial Analysts evaluate all facets of
the housing authorities’ financial activities, including
compliance with their Procurement Policies and contracts. These activities necessitate the use of
judgment and discretion with regard to monetary transactions and
entitlements. Access by a non-federal
employee would compromise the integrity of future competitions, contracts and
procurement actions and would impede the government’s ability to conduct
adequate oversight of recipients of Federal funds.
The employees who perform these functions have access to
private, personnel sensitive and confidential information, including
proprietary vendor information.
Preserving the sanctity of this data demands the discretionary exercise
of Government authority and therefore involves the act of governing. These activities require the use of
Government authority to protect the interests of its citizens as this data
significantly affects the life, liberty, or property of private persons or
companies. During on site reviews,
employees in both functions view personnel and tenant files that contain
confidential information such as social security numbers. Maintaining these functions as inherently
governmental guarantees that any final agency action complies with the laws and
policies of the United States. It
ensures that decisions reflect the independent conclusions of agency officials
and not those of contractors and private companies that may profit from the
misuse of this confidential or personal information. The employee in the
administrative support function views and maintains personnel files of
government employees, which contain all manner of personal information such as
social security numbers, home addresses and other personal information. Access by non-federal employees would
compromise the health and welfare of government employees in light of the
current acts of terrorism against our government.
Finally and perhaps most importantly, in accordance with
Circular A-76 (see Appendix 2, paragraph (G)(3) of OMB Circular No. A-76
Revised Supplemental Handbook) the definition of this activity as a commercial
activity violates the precedent established with this inventory. This same activity Function Code, C401, was
assigned a Reason code of I (see Sequence Number 173). Therefore, as a matter of consistency and
for the reason of established precedent, all activities with a Function Code of
C401 should be designated as inherently governmental.
Conclusion:
C401 Financial Analyst
Maintaining
this function as inherently governmental ensures that any final agency action
complies with the laws and policies of the United States. Maintaining it as inherently governmental
ensures that decisions reflect the independent conclusions of agency officials
and not those of contractors who may have interests that are not in concert
with the public interest, and may be beyond the reach of management controls
otherwise applicable to public employees.
Additionally, this will ensure that the decisions made by these employees
reflect the independent conclusions of agency officials.
Additionally, the
work performed under this category involves access to confidential
information. Access by other than an
employee of the federal government would compromise the interests of its
citizens as this data significantly affects the life, liberty, or property of
private persons. It also includes
access to business sensitive data that could compromise the legitimate business
interests of the PHA contractors. It
would impede governmental authority and disrupt the procurement process.
Finally,
as a matter of consistency, the position should be designated as inherently
governmental, just as it is in other parts of the inventory.
Assistant Secretary for
Public and Indian Housing A-76/FAIR Act Inventory:
D000 Administrative Support
The
primary function of the PIH Administrative Support (AS) person is to support
the staff by performing a variety of administrative and technical support
functions and duties that are important to the work of the organization. One of the main duties of the AS is the
maintenance of the Time and Attendance records, as well as other sensitive
personnel information. The AS works closely with and/ communicates with key
Departmental staff, executives of other Federal agencies, members of congress,
and executives from public housing authorities. S/he handles all correspondence, such as acknowledgment letters,
requests for additional information and transmittal memorandum, all containing
references, dates and citations, which require researching and extracting
information from files, records and regulations.
In
accordance with Circular A-76 (see Appendix 2, paragraph (G)(3) of OMB Circular
No. A-76 Revised Supplemental Handbook), the definition of this activity as a
commercial activity violates the precedent established with this
inventory. The activities under
Function Code D000 are assigned a reason code of I (Inherently Governmental) at
other places in the inventory (compare Sequence Number 403, et al to 1969, et
al.). Therefore, as a matter of consistency
and for reason of established precedent, all activities with Function code D000
should be designated as Inherently Governmental.
Assistant Secretary for
Public and Indian Housing A-76/FAIR Act Inventory:
L200 Grants Monitoring and Evaluation
In
accordance with Circular A-76 (see Appendix 2, paragraph (G)(3) of OMB Circular
No. A-76 Revised Supplemental Handbook), the definition of this activity as a
commercial activity violates the precedent established with this inventory. The activities under Function Code L200 are
assigned a reason code of I (Inherently Governmental) at other places in the
inventory. In one instance, a group of
45 employees performing this function are considered Inherently governmental,
while another group of 32 employees performing this function are considered
commercial (compare Sequence Numbers 2115 and 2019). As a matter of consistency and for reason of established
precedent, all activities with Function code L200 should be designated as
Inherently Governmental.
Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing
A-76/FAIR Act Inventory:
T804 Architect-Engineering
1. The employees serving in positions indicated
by this function code must have technical skills
found in their colleagues in the private sector. However, while the technical knowledge of design and construction
is critical to the performance of their duties, the essence of their function
is to make value judgments regarding the suitability of proposed designs and
construction for government programs.
Their reviews constitute value judgments in making decisions for the
Federal Government. Thus they are engaged in activities that bind the United
States to take or not to take some action by contract, policy, regulation,
authorization, and/or order, as described in the Detailed Description of Duties
set out herein below. These activities
also require the exercise of discretion
involving monetary transactions and entitlements. By defining this function as inherently governmental, the agency
will guarantee that any final agency action complies with the laws and policies
of the United States. Additionally, this will ensure that the decisions
performed by these employees reflect the independent conclusions of agency
officials.
2. The employees who perform this function have
access to competition and procurement sensitive information, as described in
the Detailed Description of Duties set out herein below. This function necessitates the use of
discretion with regard to monetary transactions and entitlements. Access to this sensitive information by a
non-federal employee would compromise the integrity of future competitions,
contracts, and procurement actions. It
would impede governmental authority and disrupt the procurement process. In addition, releasing to a contractor the
information necessary to accomplish the function will result in contractor
access to confidential business information.
3. The employees who perform this function engage in the inherently
governmental exercise of discretion in the application of governmental
authority as they must review and comment on the suitability of actions which
exert ultimate control over the acquisition, use, or disposition of the
property, real or personal, tangible or intangible, of the United States,
including the collection, control, or disbursement of appropriated and other
Federal funds, as described in the Detailed Description of Duties set out
herein below. Maintaining this function
as inherently governmental ensures in using the products of these contracts,
that any final agency action complies with the laws and policies of the United
States.
Description of duties and relation to inherently
governmental standards for
for T804 Architect-Engineering
HUD design professionals categorized as
“Architect-Engineering” include architects, engineers, cost analysts, and
construction analysts. These all are primarily concerned with monitoring and
compliance-assurance activities that involve the application and interpretation
of HUD statutes, regulations, handbooks, guidelines, and directives. The focus of these positions is to serve the
taxpayers by protecting the public housing real estate assets against fraud,
waste, and abuse, and to help assure an adequate supply of safe, affordable
housing.
Architect-Engineering duties
include:
a. Acquiring and
analyzing facts and utilizing sound judgment in applying legal and technical
standards to these facts;
b. Analyzing the
pertinent regulations;
c. Providing oversight and technical assistance to Public
Housing Agencies (PHAs) for the planning, design, construction and maintenance
of new and existing public housing dwelling units using public housing grant
funds;
d. Determining
whether the PHA’s practices comply with the regulations and HUD Handbooks and
guidelines;
e. Reviewing environmental studies;
f.
Recommending appropriate
actions to correct noncompliance;
g. Monitoring subsequent PHA activities to ensure the
prescribed corrective steps have been taken;
h. Writing review reports summarizing all findings and
recommendations.
i.
Assembling data and administrative records
for administrative hearings, including those before Administrative Law Judges
or Federal Courts;
j.
Recommending debarment
of program participants; and
k. Numerous other compliance and monitoring tasks.
Architect-Engineers also perform the
following duties:
a. Answering
Congressional Inquiries;
b.
Responding to requests
under the Freedom of Information Act;
c.
Analyzing the
requirements of construction, processing procedures, escrow procedures, and all
other issues related to the physical asset;
d. Advising and educating
PHAs, contractors, and others concerning HUD standards and requirements for
physical assets;
e. Answering
heavy volumes of technical questions in telephone and electronic mail
communications from PHAs, contractors, tenants, local officials and the general
public;
f.
Developing creative
approaches to present HUD programs to individuals and groups from diverse
backgrounds, often in the context of highly sensitive and controversial
issues; and
g.
Communicating
effectively, orally and in writing, with HUD clients, local government
officials, citizen groups, counseling agencies, attorneys, and the public at
large on a wide variety of matters; and,
The above-described multiple duties
of the Architect-Engineer do not stand alone, but must be integrated to form
the basis for a decision. Merging all
of these compliance, monitoring, and oversight functions may reveal conflicts
with government directives or regulations.
The function of forming decisions, merging technical data, resolving
conflicts, or finding them irresolvable, is an integral part of protecting
public housing assets. If not done
properly, the result can be the commitment of grant funds where there should be
none, or the deterioration, misuse, or other degradation of the physical
asset. This not only adversely affects
the public housing assets; it also
adversely affects families, neighborhoods and communities.
Employees who perform duties within Function Code T804
should be classified as inherently governmental under the standard identified
in OFPP Policy Letter 92-1. Their work
requires the interpretation and execution of the laws of the United States.
The Architect-Engineers who perform these functions under
T804 bind the United States to take actions by contract, policy, regulation and
authorization (through, for example, Capital Funds, HOPE VI funds, or
Replacement Housing Factor funds) under the several Public Housing
programs. Their duties include the
review and recommendation for approval of funding obligations as well as for
the recapture of unused or improperly used program funds. These activities require the exercise of a
high degree of judgment and discretion involving monetary transactions and
entitlements. Therefore, they are
inherently governmental. By defining
this function as inherently governmental, the agency will guarantee that any
final agency action complies with the laws and policies of the United States. Additionally, this will ensure that the
decisions performed by these employees reflect the independent conclusions of
agency officials.
At the Field Office level, the employees who perform
these functions are not “back office” employees who only process review
construction documents. Rather, they are an intrinsic part of the oversight and
monitoring process by which the Department ensures and enforces compliance with
its regulations—programmatic as well as financial.
Although it may be argued that Architect-engineering
contractors or consultants could provide technical assistance to PHAs in the
area of planning, design, and construction, the best interests of the public
housing resident and the taxpayers would not be served by this
arrangement. Private companies, by their
nature, are profit motivated and cannot be viewed as independent third
parties. For example, private
consultants may advise a PHA that a project needs to be done at a certain time,
with a particular level of effort, and state that it is sufficiently complex as
to require on-site architectural or engineering services. Thus, the total project cost (as the
architect-engineer’s profit is a percentage of the total project cost)
significantly increases. This results in
an inefficient use of government funds that hurts public housing residents by reducing
the total number of projects that the PHA can accomplish with their limited
funds.
Finally,
the employees who perform these functions have access to highly sensitive
competitive procurement information.
During monitoring reviews, the Architect-Engineers evaluate all facets
of the housing authorities’ construction activities, including compliance with
their Procurement Policies and contracts.
These activities necessitate the use of judgment and discretion with
regard to monetary transactions and entitlements. Access by a non-federal employee would compromise the integrity
of future competitions, contracts and procurement actions and would impede the
government’s ability to conduct adequate oversight of recipients of Federal
funds.
Conclusion: T804
Architect-Engineering
Maintaining
this function as inherently governmental ensures that any final agency action
complies with the laws and policies of the United States. Maintaining it as inherently governmental
ensures that decisions reflect the independent conclusions of agency officials
and not those of contractors who may have interests that are not in concert
with the public interest, and may be beyond the reach of management controls
otherwise applicable to public employees.
Additionally, this will ensure that the decisions made by these
employees reflect the independent conclusions of agency officials.
Additionally, the
work performed under this category involves access to confidential
information. Access by other than an
employee of the federal government would compromise the interests of its
citizens as this data significantly affects the life, liberty, or property of
private persons. It also includes
access to business sensitive data that could compromise the legitimate business
interests of the PHA contractors. It
would impede governmental authority and disrupt the procurement process.
D000 Administrative Support
The
primary function of the CPD Administrative Support (AS) person is to support
the staff by performing a variety of administrative and technical support
functions and duties that are important to the work of the organization. One of the main duties of the AS is the
maintenance of the Time and Attendance records, as well as other sensitive
personnel information. The AS works closely with and communicates with key
Departmental staff, executives of other Federal agencies, members of congress,
and executives from public housing authorities. S/he handles all correspondence, such as acknowledgment letters,
requests for additional information and transmittal memorandum, all containing
references, dates and citations, which require researching and extracting
information from files, records and regulations.
In
accordance with Circular A-76 (see Appendix 2, paragraph G(3) of OMB Circular
No. A-76 Revised Supplemental Handbook), the definition of this activity as a
commercial activity violates the precedent established with this
inventory. The activities under
Function Code D000 are assigned a reason code of I (Inherently Governmental) at
other places in the inventory (compare Sequence Number 403, et al to 249, et
al). Therefore, as a matter of
consistency and for reason of established precedent, all activities with
Function code D000 should be designated as Inherently Governmental.
Assistant
Secretary for Field Policy and Management
D000 Administrative Support
The
primary function of the FPM Administrative Support (AS) person is to support
the staff by performing a variety of administrative and technical support
functions and duties that are important to the work of the organization. One of the main duties of the AS is the
maintenance of the Time and Attendance records, as well as other sensitive
personnel information. The AS works closely with and communicates with key
Departmental staff, executives of other Federal agencies, members of congress,
and executives from public housing authorities. S/he handles all correspondence, such as acknowledgment letters,
requests for additional information and transmittal memorandum, all containing
references, dates and citations, which require researching and extracting
information from files, records and regulations.
In
accordance with Circular A-76 (see Appendix 2, paragraph G(3) of OMB Circular
No. A-76 Revised Supplemental Handbook), the definition of this activity as a
commercial activity violates the precedent established with this
inventory. The activities under
Function Code D000 are assigned a reason code of I (Inherently Governmental) at
other places in the inventory (compare Sequence Number 403, et al to 562, et
al). Therefore, as a matter of
consistency and for reason of established precedent, all activities with
Function code D000 should be designated as Inherently Governmental.
Assistant
Secretary for Field Policy and Management
L200 Grants Monitoring and Evaluation
In accordance with Circular A-76
(see Appendix 2, paragraph (G)(3) of OMB Circular No. A-76 Revised Supplemental
Handbook), the definition of this activity as a commercial activity violates
the precedent established with this inventory.
The activities under Function Code L200 are assigned a reason code of I
(Inherently Governmental) at other places in the inventory (compare Sequence
Numbers 2115 and 110). As a matter of
consistency and for reason of established precedent, all activities with
Function code L200 should be designated as Inherently Governmental.
Office of General Counsel
D000 Administrative Support
The
primary function of the OGC Administrative Support (AS) person is to support
the staff by performing a variety of administrative and technical support
functions and duties that are important to the work of the organization. One of the main duties of the AS is the
maintenance of the Time and Attendance records, as well as other sensitive
personnel information. The AS works closely with and communicates with key
Departmental staff, executives of other Federal agencies, members of congress,
and executives from public housing authorities. S/he handles all correspondence, such as acknowledgment letters,
requests for additional information and transmittal memorandum, all containing
references, dates and citations, which require researching and extracting
information from files, records and regulations.
In
accordance with Circular A-76 (see Appendix 2, paragraph G(3) of OMB Circular
No. A-76 Revised Supplemental Handbook), the definition of this activity as a
commercial activity violates the precedent established with this inventory. The activities under Function Code D000 are
assigned a reason code of I (Inherently Governmental) at other places in the
inventory (compare Sequence Number 403, et al to 1713, et al). Therefore, as a matter of consistency and
for reason of established precedent, all activities with Function code D000
should be designated as Inherently Governmental.
Assistant
Secretary for Administration
L200 Grants Monitoring and Evaluation
In accordance with Circular A-76
(see Appendix 2, paragraph (G)(3) of OMB Circular No. A-76 Revised Supplemental
Handbook), the definition of this activity as a commercial activity violates
the precedent established with this inventory.
The activities under Function Code L200 are assigned a reason code of I
(Inherently Governmental) at other places in the inventory (compare Sequence
Numbers 2115 and 110). As a matter of
consistency and for reason of established precedent, all activities with
Function code L200 should be designated as Inherently Governmental.
Chief Financial Officer
C401 Financial Analyst
In accordance
with Circular A-76 (see Appendix 2, paragraph G(3) of OMB Circular No. A-76
Revised Supplemental Handbook), the definition of this activity as a commercial
activity violates the precedent established with this inventory. The activities under Function Code C401 are
assigned a reason code of I (Inherently Governmental) at other places in the
inventory (compare Sequence Number 166 to 173). Therefore, as a matter of consistency and for reason of
established precedent, all activities with Function code C401 should be
designated as Inherently Governmental.