Affiliated with the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), we are comprised of 40 HUD Locals throughout the U.S. Members elect delegates and the Council Executive Board meets monthly to set our direction/priorities.


June 7 - is providing information on how you can FIGHT BACK. Read up on the Executive Orders and how you can FIGHT BACK in below link.

DO NOT contact congress on duty time or use agency equipment!


Legislation Tracker

This news tracker holds legislation that affects all of us as HUD employees and as Federal employees.
- Find your Senator
- Find your House Representative
- Find, review and easily sign up for e:alerts on bills at
DO NOT contact congress on duty time or use agency equipment!

Fed Employee Buyout Boost

S-1888 - Senate bill increases standard buyout to $40,000 government-wide. $25,000 was set in 1990s. Bipartisan measure approved without objection, no counterpart bill offered.

10/2017 congress.govRead More
Official Union Time

H.R. 1293 - Would amend Title 5, United States Code, to require that the office of Personnel Management submit an annual report to Congress relating to the use of official time by Federal employees. Click "Read More" and sign up for alerts on this bill.
Update: 10/05/2017 Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar

05/2017 congress.govRead More
Stop Wasteful Federal Bonuses Act

S.742 - Prohibits a fed agency from awarding a bonus to employee for 5 years after adverse finding, would also require employee to repay any bonuses awarded for any year in which the adverse finding made. Update:Still on legislative calendar

03/2017 congress.govRead More
HUD Inspection Process Enforcement Reform Act of 2017

S.160 Bill to reform inspection process and gives HUD Sec authority TO REMOVE HUD employee if misconduct or performance warrants such action.
Latest action: None

01/17/2017 congress.govRead More

H.R. 559 (Modern Employment Reform Improvement and Transformation Act) Empowers agency heads to fire federal employees for misconduct or performance-related reasons. Employees must be given written notice 1-3 weeks in advance of being terminated.
Latest action: None

01/13/2017 congress.govRead More
Promote Accountability and Government Efficiency Act

H.R. 6278 Changes to fed pay system, prohibits pay raises, makes all feds "at will", allows immediate suspension, eliminates official time so union reps can no longer work to protect your pay/benefits/job during work day. Latest action: None

09/28/2016 congress.comRead More

H.R.5202 - Waters (D-CA)
Prohibits HUD from relocating to any core office of MFHSG any asset mgmt position that, as of this bill's enactment, is located at a non-core office of that Office. "Core office" is a regional hub office in ATL, CHI, FtWorth, NYC, or SanFran Latest action: None

05/11/2016 congress.govRead More

3 Executive Orders to fight


Issues affecting us are in this tracker

Fed Employee Buyout Boost

increase standard to $40,000

Official Union Time

Your Right For Representation Gone?

Stop Wasteful Fed Bonuses Act

Prohibits bonuses for 5 years

S.160 HUD Bill by Rubio (R-FL)

Inspection Process & Enforcement

H.R. 559 Merit Act

Empowers heads on employee firing

H.R. 6278 Page Act

Cut fed salaries to $1?

H.R. 5202 HUD MF Field Offices Act

MF Staff Relocation

Senate Approves Spending Package With Pay Raise, Setting Up Fight With House

Government Exec, August 1 - The Senate on Wednesday voted 92-6 to approve a $154.2 billion spending bill that includes a 2019 pay raise for civilian federal employees, setting up a conflict with the House and the Trump administration. The proposal to increase federal workers' pay by 1.9 percent next year was included within a "minibus" appropriations bill (H.R. 6147) funding the Interior Department, Environmental Protection Agency, Agriculture Department, Housing and Urban Development Department, Transportation Department, and financial services and general government agencies for fiscal 2019. It survived more than a week of debate and negotiations by lawmakers on the Senate floor. But the pay raise still faces headwinds. The Trump administration has proposed a pay freeze for all civilian federal workers for next year, and the House effectively endorsed the pay freeze in its version of the spending package. The administration has suggested that a $1 billion interagency workforce fund to be used in pilot programs for performance-based pay would help replace the across-the-board pay hike, but neither chamber has included money for that fund in appropriations bills. read article

In 4-Hour Hearing, Judge Suggests Executive Orders Ignore Half of Labor Statute

Government Exec, July 26 - After months of posturing by the Trump administration and federal employee unions, both sides had their day in court Wednesday, as a federal judge spent four hours challenging both sides over the president's recent workforce executive orders.

More than a dozen federal employee unions have sued in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to block implementation of the executive orders, challenging their legality on a number of fronts. They have asserted that the orders conflict with the Civil Service Reform Act and that the act precludes the president from weighing in on collective bargaining altogether.

Jackson said she would take the arguments raised under advisement and issue a written ruling in the coming days. But she had one broader critique for how the Trump administration analyzed the Civil Service Reform Act in crafting its executive orders.

"You were very careful in citing the ´effective operation of government´ aspect of the law, but that´s only one aspect Congress was concerned about when they wrote it," she said. "Congress makes it very clear that it believes effective unions—and collective bargaining—are in the public interest. But these EOs are about half of that balance and not the other." read article

White House Dismisses Unions´ Complaints Against Workforce Executive Orders as Premature

Government Exec, July 24 - Attorneys for the government plan to argue Wednesday that a federal court lacks jurisdiction to hear a legal challenge against President Trump´s recent workforce executive orders, and that unions were premature in filing the challenge. But a cursory look at the actions taken by the Trump administration and federal agencies since the orders´ enactment in May calls those claims into question. read article

AFGE Recounts Evictions, 'Union Busting' at Federal Agencies

Government Exec, July 12 - In a call with reporters, American Federation of Government Employees National President J. David Cox said that union access to office space is integral to labor groups being able to meet with and represent front-line employees as required by the 1978 Civil Service Reform Act. Union leaders representing employees at the Social Security Administration, the Veterans Affairs Department and the Bureau of Prisons said management is moving to evict unions from office space, preventing them from taking documents off-site and blocking them from using official time or unpaid leave to represent workers.

"Union officials at the Social Security Administration are being stripped of access to vital tools that help us represent working people as we are required to do by law, including telephones, computers, Internet access, and even bulletin boards," Cox said. "And as of yesterday, management has removed union access to all meeting rooms on agency property."

John Kostelnik, president of AFGE Local 3969, which represents Bureau of Prisons employees in Victorville, Calif., said the administration´s implementation of the executive order has hamstrung the agency's ability to respond to the massive influx of detainees from the White House's zero tolerance policy for undocumented immigrants and asylum seekers. read article

Federal Judge Consolidates Lawsuits on Workforce Executive Orders, Schedules Hearing

Government Exec, June 19 - A federal judge announced Monday that she is consolidating three different legal challenges brought against President Trump's recent workforce executive orders, and has scheduled a hearing date of July 25.

Since the enactment of three controversial executive orders aimed at making it easier to fire federal employees and reducing the influence of federal employee unions, the American Federation of Government Employees; the National Treasury Employees Union; and the Federal Workers Alliance, a coalition of 13 smaller unions, all have sued the Trump administration challenging the edicts. AFGE and NTEU both have filed injunctions to prevent the orders from being implemented until after their court challenges have been resolved.

In an order issued June 18, U.S. District Court Judge for the District of Columbia Ketanji Brown Jackson consolidated all three cases, citing their similarity in facts and legal questions. She also agreed to "expedited briefing" of the case, meaning the court will skip traditional preliminary phases of the case and proceed directly to discussion of the merits, with a motion hearing scheduled for July 25. read article

HUD tells union to vacate federal office space, citing executive orders, June 18 - The Department of Housing and Urban Development is moving quickly to implement President Donald Trump's recent executive order on official time by telling federal employee unions they can no longer use federal facilities or resources to do the organizations´ work. And the Social Security Administration and Department of Health and Human Services may be following in their footsteps.

HUD told the American Federation of Government Employees and the National Federation of Federal Employees that it wants to engage in midterm negotiations to implement the requirements under the EO. But one key proposal submitted by the agency would be for the unions to vacate federal office space by July 15.

"No union representative, when acting on behalf of the union, may be permitted the use of government property or any other agency resources. Such property and resources include office or meeting space, reserved parking spaces, phones, computers, computer systems, copy machines, paper, filing cabinets, keys, scanners, external drives, fax machines, use of printing services, subscriptions to information services (cyberdfeds, etc.) and all other government property or resources," HUD told AFGE on June 14. "The union shall have until July 15, 2018, to vacate all offices they currently occupy, return all government property they currently possess and cease using government resources. This applies to field and HQ." read article.

Read the June 15 Washington Post article "Social Security, HUD act on Trump's orders in move to emasculate unions"
Read the Gov Exec article "HUD Moves to Evict Union From Federal Office Space"
Read the Federal Times article "Why HUD is evicting an employee union from its offices"

FIGHT BACK Against the Executive Orders!

NOW - and Council 222 ask you to FIGHT BACK against the three Executive Orders by clicking on the link at the end of this paragraph. When you click the link you will see the following notice, please comply - IMPORTANT: This information should not be downloaded using government equipment, read during duty time or sent to others using government equipment, because it suggests action to be taken in support of or against legislation. Do not use your government email address or government phone in contacting your Member of Congress. is providing information on how you can FIGHT BACK.

House Democrats Join Fight Against Workforce Executive Orders

Government Exec, June 14 A group of 23 House Democrats, including Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and Whip Steny Hoyer, demanded Thursday that President Trump rescind three controversial executive orders that seek to make it easier for agencies to fire federal workers and significantly curb the influence of federal employee unions. In a letter to Trump, the lawmakers said the executive orders erode statutorily required protections for whistleblowers, and make it easier to politicize hiring and firing decisions in the federal workplace. read article

Republican Lawmakers Ask Trump to Repeal Workforce Executive Orders

Government Exec, June 13 A group of 21 House Republicans sent a letter to President Trump Sunday asking him to reverse course on three controversial executive orders aimed at making it easier to fire federal workers and curbing the influence of federal employee unions. In the letter, the GOP members of Congress touted the work of federal employees and asked the White House to rescind the executive orders and uphold the current law. read article

AFGE Sues to Block Official Time Executive Order

Government Exec, May 31 - The largest union representing federal employees sued the Trump administration Wednesday over President Trump´s executive order significantly curbing the use of official time by union representatives, arguing the edict violates the First Amendment and exceeds the president's constitutional authority.

In a lawsuit filed at the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, the American Federation of Government Employees said the White House's Executive Order Ensuring Transparency, Accountability and Efficiency in Taxpayer Funded Union Time Use violates the First Amendment-guaranteed freedom of association and effectively rewrites portions of the 1978 Civil Service Reform Act without the assent of Congress. read article

Trump goes after Feds in latest executive orders

Federal Times, May 27 - In three executive orders signed May 25, 2018, President Donald Trump took aim at making federal employees easier to fire while cutting back on union time.

Merit System Principles
Official Time
Collective Bargaining

The first order fulfils a longstanding goal of the Trump administration in making it easier for the government to fire poor performers from federal positions. The order would limit the amount of time an employee under investigation for misconduct could spend on probation and encourage firings.

The second order specifically targets the use of official time, which allows federal employees to conduct union activities such as representing employees in disputes and negotiating contracts with the agency, by stating that federal employees must spend at least 75 percent of their time doing government work.

Official time use has recently come under fire by both OPM and members of Congress, who say that the rising amount of time spent per employee is a waste of taxpayer money. However, many experts have said that current methods for measuring official time use are likely wildly inaccurate.

The use of official time is protected under the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, and the amount of official time used by employees within an agency is usually up to the negotiations between unions and the agency.

The third of the executive orders calls for the renegotiation of such contracts, placing the responsibility for the negotiating strategy with the Office of Management and Budget within the White House and requiring that union contracts are posted online. read article

Major Changes to Federal Separation Pay and Hiring Tucked Into Senate Defense Bill

Government Exec, June 8 - The Senate on Thursday advanced a measure that would dramatically alter the federal hiring process and permanently boost the maximum buyout agencies can offer their employees. The hiring changes included in the Fiscal 2019 National Defense Authorization Act stem from a bill a Senate panel cleared last year to enable the expedited hiring of applicants with college degrees. The provision would allow agency heads to circumvent normal hiring restrictions to bring on university students or those who have recently completed their studies. The agency leader could appoint a "qualified individual" to any competitive service, professional or administrative position at the level of GS-11 or below.

Another governmentwide provision in the Defense authorization measure would enable agencies to pay up to $40,000 to employees opting to participate in a Voluntary Separation Incentive Program offer. That would mark an increase from the current maximum of $25,000, which has been the limit since Congress created VSIP in 1993. The Defense Department has maintained a carve-out to offer buyout recipients up to $40,000 for the last two years. A Senate panel unanimously approved a similar provision as a standalone bill last year. The White House has pushed Congress to adopt the increase. Several agencies offered buyouts to a wide swath of employees in the first year of the Trump administration, but Congress has since placed significant restrictions on those downsizing efforts. read article

OPM submits 4 familiar retirement proposals to the House for consideration

FederalNewsRadio, May 7 - Specifically, OPM proposed:
    ° A increase in employee contributions by 1 percent per year "until the employee is contributing half of the current regular FERS employee normal cost percentage,"
    ° An elimination of the cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) for current and future FERS participants and a 0.5 percent cut to the COLA for CSRS participants of what the typical formula currently allows,
    ° Basing future retirement benefits on the average of an employee's highest five years of salary, and
    ° An elimination of the FERS annuity supplement and the supplemental annuity for survivor annuitants, with some exceptions.

In total, OPM expects these proposals would save $143.5 billion over the next 10 years. According to the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), which obtained OPM's proposals and transmitted them to the media, the Trump administration wants to include these changes in the fiscal 2019 defense authorization act. read article

A flatline retirement: Can you make it?, June 6 The Trump administration has submitted a legislative package that would, among other things, eliminate cost of living adjustments for current and future workers retiring under the Federal Employees Retirement System. No more inflation catch-ups, ever! If you retire on $1,200 per month this year, in 2030 you would still receive $1,200, and ditto 10 years after that. A flatline pension — forever. The legislation would mean no COLAs no matter how bad inflation might become and no matter how long — if you are among the majority of working feds — you live. So is that the ghost of the Christmas future for you?

The majority of current retirees, who are under the Civil Service Retirement System, would still get COLAs under the White House plan to slash the cost of the civil service retirement program. But those COLAs would be reduced by 0.5 percent below the actual rise in inflation. While nothing like the hit proposed for the FERS folks, who would lose all COLA protection forever, the value of the CSRS annuity would shrink each and every year there was any sort of inflation. John Hatton, deputy director for Advocacy of the National Association of Active and Retired Federal Employees, estimated that over a normal lifetime in retirement and assuming a 3 percent inflation rate, the typical FERS retiree could lose one-third of their buying power, or cash to spend. That is because the pension would no longer keep pace with article

Housing Advocates Are Suing Ben Carson and HUD, May 8 - Housing advocates plan to file a complaint on Tuesday against the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and its secretary, Ben Carson, in an effort to put pressure on the federal government to enforce fair housing law.

The challenge calls on HUD to fully implement an Obama-era rule on Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing—a critical yet historically neglected policy established by the Fair Housing Act of 1968. In accordance with the rule, communities across the country had begun drafting and submitting desegregation plans over the last two years. In January, HUD effectively suspended the rule. read article

OPM Proposes Legislation to Cut Retirement Benefits for Current and Former Feds, May 7 - Office of Personnel Management Director Jeff Pon wrote a letter to House Speaker Paul Ryan late last week requesting a number of legislative changes that would cut retirement benefits for federal workers.

Increase size Office of Personnel Management Director Jeff Pon wrote a letter to House Speaker Paul Ryan late last week requesting a number of legislative changes that would cut retirement benefits for federal workers. The request, which Pon said would save taxpayers $143.5 billion over the next decade, comes on the eve of the White House's planned introduction of $15 billion in spending cuts as part of a rescission package. Pon said his plans, which are a laundry list of previously proposed cuts to federal employee retirement programs, would "bring federal benefits more in line with the private sector."

Included in the proposals are plans to eliminate Federal Employees' Retirement System supplements for federal employees who retire before Social Security kicks in at age 62, going forward; change the basis of a retiree's defined benefit annuity payments from their highest three years of salary to their highest five years; and increase the amount federal employees contribute to FERS by 1 percentage point per year until they reach an overall contribution level of 7.25 percent, matching the government's contribution. Pon wrote that after agencies and employees reach contribution parity, employee contributions to FERS should fluctuate on a year-by-year basis to maintain the 50-50 cost sharing. OPM also proposed the elimination of cost-of-living adjustments for FERS retirees—both current and future—and the reduction of Civil Service Retirement System COLAs by 0.5 percent. Pon also recommended eliminating a provision of the law that requires FERS disability annuities to be reduced by the recipient's "assumed disability insurance benefit" through Social Security, instead basing the reduction on the individual's actual Social Security benefits. read article

Unintended Tax Reform Fallout Creating ´Potentially Ruinous´ Bills for Thousands of Feds, April 5 - About 25,000 federal employees per year could face a massive new tax liability under a provision of the overhaul of the U.S. Tax Code President Trump signed into law this year, thanks to the removal of a deduction that helped employees forced to relocate by their agency. The issue particularly impacts senior executives whose mobility is required as part of the job, as well as certain occupations—such as air traffic controllers—who are frequently asked to move around. As part of the relocation services it offers, the federal government pays for employees' moving costs related to household goods. That benefit was previously tax deductible and handled by the employee's agency. The tax reform shepherded through Congress by Republicans last year removed that deduction, and now, with guidance unclear, agencies are passing the full burden on to the employees. read article

Unintended Tax Reform Fallout Creating ´Potentially Ruinous´ Bills for Thousands of Feds, April 5 - About 25,000 federal employees per year could face a massive new tax liability under a provision of the overhaul of the U.S. Tax Code President Trump signed into law this year, thanks to the removal of a deduction that helped employees forced to relocate by their agency. The issue particularly impacts senior executives whose mobility is required as part of the job, as well as certain occupations—such as air traffic controllers—who are frequently asked to move around. As part of the relocation services it offers, the federal government pays for employees' moving costs related to household goods. That benefit was previously tax deductible and handled by the employee's agency. The tax reform shepherded through Congress by Republicans last year removed that deduction, and now, with guidance unclear, agencies are passing the full burden on to the employees. read article

Telework cuts could make government even less competitive in hiring

FederalNewsRadio, March 29 - After the Department of Agriculture cut back its telework policy, and with the Department of Education's currently up in the air, some federal employees are concerned about the future of the popular program. But agencies concerned solely with the pros and cons of letting employees work from home could be missing the bigger picture. Frank Landefeld, public sector market leader at MorganFranklin consulting, said restricting such work-life policies could make it harder for the federal government to compete for new talent.

"If the federal government wants to survive the candidate battle that they're going to have, because they need to hire many of the same kinds of skillsets in this world where cybersecurity is a big concern, and it's not just Amazon coming to town. It's going to be all of the other organizations that want to be within shouting distance of wherever Amazon lives on the East Coast. That, quite honestly, is going to start absorbing all of the candidate pool. The government needs to make sure that they have a dog in that fight," Landefeld said.

And that competition can be fierce. Landefeld said that the fastest growing private companies are the ones who implement work-life policies like teleworking. In fact, he said, most are nearly 100 percent virtual, and they're growing at exponential rates, even in the current low-unemployment economic environment.

Landefeld thinks the problem with telework implementation is a generational gap. He said 19 percent of federal employees don't telework because their supervisor won't allow them. Landefeld attributes the reluctance of supervisors to allow telework to either a lack of experience with the program, a lack of training in it, or simply an old-school perspective that places more value on line-of-sight management. read article

House reinstates rule that can target fed pay, agency funds, March 27 - The House of Representatives in a contentious March 20, 2018, vote passed the continuation of an old procedural rule that would give Congress the ability to cut the pay of individual federal workers and to eliminate entire agency programs. The Holman Rule, first passed in 1876 and named for Indiana Rep. William Holman, was removed from the House rule book in 1983. The rule was then reinstated in the Rules of the House for the 115th Congress, but applied only to the first session or year. House Republicans extended the Holman Rule through the end of the current Congress by adding it to H.Res. 787, which provides for the consideration of two unrelated bills.

"Last night, without any public debate, House Republicans snuck into legislation the Holman Rule — a cynical and dangerous attack on federal workers that allows members of Congress to reduce the salaries of federal employees. This archaic tool, also known as the Armageddon Rule, is nothing more than a backdoor way for Republicans to dismantle the federal workforce and carry out political vendettas at the expense of career civil servants," said Rep. Gerry Connolly, D-Va. read article

Conservatives are using the Supreme Court to destroy unions February 28 ... Conservatives of late have charged that liberals refuse to acknowledge the importance of allowing revered and useful social institutions to thrive and maintain their organizational integrity. So, for example, the right insists that organizations affiliated with religious groups opposed to contraception must, under no circumstances, be required to cover birth control in their health plans This bundle of contradictions is on open display in the case of Janus v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees. Argued this week before the Supreme Court, the suit is an effort to overturn 41 years of settled precedent for the purpose of crippling the American labor movement.

The claimant, Mark Janus, an Illinois state social worker, argues that his First Amendment liberties are violated because he has to pay an "agency fee" to the union even though he is not a member and might disagree with its politics. On the merits, nothing about the agency fee deprives Janus of his right as a citizen to speak out as he wishes. And the idea behind collective bargaining is that, when a majority of employees decide to join a union, its bargaining typically produces higher pay and benefits for the entire bargaining unit. Agency fees pay for this collective effort. read article

Trump Formalizes 2019 Pay Freeze Proposal, Revives Benefits Cuts February 12 - The Trump administration announced Monday that it will seek a pay freeze for all civilian employees in 2019, confirming a plan long expected from the White House. The administration's fiscal 2019 budget proposal released Monday by the Office of Management and Budget also includes a number of provisions that would cut federal workers' retirement and other benefits. The budget describes the pay freeze plan as the first step in moving the civil service to a pay for performance system, pairing the freeze with a $1 billion interagency fund to reward high performers. read article

Trump Calls for 'Reskilling' Federal Workforce, Firing 'Overhaul' and Reducing Union Influence February 12 - President Trump proposed major reforms to the civil service in his fiscal 2019 budget request, focusing on streamlining the hiring and firing process, transitioning current employees to new federal jobs and minimizing the influence of labor groups. One of the appeal avenues many employees pursue is through their union, another area where the administration is looking to make changes. The White House noted the labor groups are actually able to negotiate over few things, and argued the organizations instead serve as a roadblock to a well-functioning government. Trump signed an executive order in September disbanding labor-management forums at federal agencies and said in his budget he would continue down that path. "Collective bargaining contracts can have a significant impact on agency performance, workplace productivity and employee satisfaction," the president said in his blueprint. "The administration sees an opportunity for progress on this front and intends to overhaul labor-management relations." read article

HUD Attempts to Limit Bargaining with Union

October 16 - HUD has refused to pay the travel expenses of Union negotiators in an effort to avoid bargaining with AFGE Council 222 over what the Department has characterized as "union-initiated changes."

When the Council requested data related to HUD’s expenditures on bargaining-related travel, HUD refused to provide the information. HUD said that it could not respond to the Council’s FOIA request because it was "very broad," and that it "would be quite costly to produce" the information requested because of the many hours of professional search time that would be required.

In spite of the difficulties imagined by the FOIA office, the labor relations office was able to provide some of the information the Council requested under federal labor-management statutes: Data related to travel expenses for Union negotiators for the past two years was provided (the Union had requested data for the past three years).

The Employee and Labor Relations Division, however, refused to provide data on travel expenses incurred by management negotiators. The Union has to wonder what HUD is hiding related to managers´ travel.

Given the current political animus against public sector unions, HUD’s recent actions seem to be part of a concerted effort to marginalize the Union and remove employee protections. In recent months, HUD has:

    •   Refused to negotiate with the Union over the Department’s recognition of a group representing other employees in the bargaining unit in what appeared to be a violation of the Union’s right to exclusive representation.
    •   Claimed the Department did not have to negotiate what it called "union-initiated bargaining." The Federal Labor Relations Authority upheld the Union´s unfair labor practice complaint, and ordered HUD to the bargaining table.
    •   Refused to pay for Union negotiators’ travel expenses in cases of so-called union-initiated bargaining.
    •   Refused to provide current versions of proposed handbooks before negotiations in an effort to keep Union negotiators ignorant of the issues before they reach the bargaining table.

HUD says it wants to work with the Union, but these actions don’t support that claim.

Our Main Contract

After four years of negotiations, the Council signed a new term contract (in 2016). A working copy is available here in pdf.

The new Main Contract reflects the work of many talented union negotiators. It contains new provisions allowing employees to both telework and maxiflex (see Article 16) as well as a shortened two step grievance process (Article 51). Previous contracts can be found within the Library link.

New Employees PowerPoint Presentation and Information

As a Council, we primarily bargain (at the national level) issues that impact your working conditions. Past negotiations have resulted in flextime, credit hours, telework, and other workplace benefits. We also work with HUD constituents to advocate for HUD programs, and fight wasteful contracting out of federal work. Please keep in mind that we are a volunteer organization; we elect our leadership from our membership. So it's very important that the best employees become union members and activists. As a bargaining unit employee, you are eligible for membership. If you have not already done so, we encourage you to talk with your Local President. Locals are the key to enforcing the benefits we negotiate at a national level. Without strong and active Locals, the contract is just paper. Also, we encourage you to explore our website. Our new employee power point presentation can answer many of your questions about what the union does at HUD. And our bargaining page incudes information on the latest bargaining issues. Again, welcome to HUD. We care deeply about HUD and its mission. We believe that respect in the workplace results in productive and creative employees. We hope you do, too. Download our Welcome To HUD powerpoint presentation and contact your Local President (listed on our About Us page) if you have any questions! To join, fill out an SF-1187 and hand it to your Local President!

The Department of Labor June 2, 2006 Final Rule requires labor organizations subject to the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, the Foreign Service Act of 1980 and the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 to periodically inform their members of their rights as union members. The Final Rule will help ensure that federal union members are given basic understanding of: 1) rights as union members; 2) responsibilities of union officers.

Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 (CSRA) - The standards of conduct provisions in this Act, among other statutes, guarantee certain rights to members of unions representing Federal employees and impose certain responsibilities on officers of these unions.
read about the CSRA > | DOL 06/02/06 Federal Register Final Rule | DOL Fact Sheet | Council 222 Constitution/ByLaws | Foreign Service Act of 1980 | Congressional Accountability Act of 1995